MT5 is the newer platform with more asset classes, better order tools, and a different programming language. MT4 is the older platform with stronger broker support, lighter resource use, and a massive library of legacy expert advisors. Most active retail traders end up using both. The question is which one to start with for your specific use case. The honest answer for most readers in 2026: MT5, unless your strategy depends on a specific MT4-only EA or your broker only supports MT4.
Side-by-side
| Feature | MT4 | MT5 |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Asset classes | Forex + CFDs | Forex, CFDs, equities, futures, options |
| Timeframes | 9 | 21 |
| Order types | 4 (market, pending limit, stop, stop-limit) | 6 (adds buy/sell stop-limit) |
| Hedging support | Yes (default) | Yes (account-level toggle) |
| Netting accounts | No | Yes |
| Depth of market | No (broker-dependent add-ons) | Yes, native |
| Economic calendar | No | Yes, native |
| Programming language | MQL4 | MQL5 (C++ syntax, multi-threaded) |
| Strategy tester | Single thread | Multi-thread, multi-currency |
| Broker support | Wider in 2026, especially in EM | Wider in EU/UK/AU; growing globally |
| EA library | 20+ years of accumulated EAs | Newer; many MT4 EAs not ported |
The case for MT5
Three reasons most new traders should start here:
- Multi-asset by design. Stocks, futures, options, forex on one platform. MT4 cannot do this without broker hacks.
- Better backtesting. The multi-threaded strategy tester runs 5-10x faster than MT4 on the same hardware. Multi-currency tests run natively.
- Native depth-of-market and economic calendar. MT4 needs broker plugins for both.
The case for MT4
Two reasons it still matters:
- Legacy EA library. Twenty years of community-built indicators and expert advisors. Many never got ported to MT5.
- Broker availability in emerging markets. Some brokers still default to MT4 in LATAM, MENA, and parts of Asia.
What is MQL5 and is it harder than MQL4?
MQL5 is closer to standard C++ than MQL4. The good: object-oriented programming, faster execution, multi-threading. The trade-off: a steeper learning curve, and you cannot port an MT4 EA to MT5 with a copy-paste. Custom logic must be re-implemented. If you do not code your own EAs, this is not your concern. If you do, budget two to four weeks of learning to port a non-trivial strategy.
Hedging vs netting accounts
MT5 introduced netting: only one position per symbol, opposing trades close existing positions. Hedging: multiple positions per symbol, can be long and short simultaneously. Most retail traders prefer hedging. The choice is set per account at the broker. MT4 only does hedging.
Which one fits your strategy?
| Strategy | Better fit |
|---|---|
| Pure FX scalping with EAs | MT4 (legacy EA library) |
| Multi-asset (FX + indices + stocks) | MT5 |
| Algo backtesting and optimisation | MT5 (faster tester) |
| Discretionary swing trading | Either; MT5 has more order types |
| Crypto CFDs | MT5 (broader native support) |
| Copy trading without EA dev | Either; depends on broker |
MT4 and MT5 at Volity
Volity provides MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 on desktop, web, and mobile (iOS and Android). Both platforms support automated trading, custom indicators, and advanced charting. Trading is executed by UBK Markets Ltd, a Cyprus Investment Firm authorised by CySEC under licence 186/12. Retail leverage is capped under ESMA product-intervention measures: 1:30 on major currency pairs, 1:20 on non-major currencies and major indices, 1:10 on other commodities, 1:5 on individual equities, 1:2 on cryptoassets.
About Volity
Volity is your all-in-one hub for money movement, market access, and financial clarity. Trading is executed by UBK Markets Ltd, a Cyprus Investment Firm authorised by CySEC under licence 186/12.
Risk disclosure
CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. Between 70% and 80% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs.
